no place for lazy people
During
the Victorian age they passed a new low says that there is work for everyone.
and people who don’t work are just lazy. for that they built Workhouses for
poor people and these workhouses are not comfortable and they tended to hanger
the kids so they can go and find jobs
for better life.
When Oliver was walking up the hill and during his
journey no one ever stopped to help him out because people think that he is a
lazy person and thats why he is poor and suffering and with helping him they
will just make him lazyer.
Crime or starvation
Poor people didn't have much choices, if they don’t steal
they will die starving. and thats was clear with Charles Dickens even though he
was not lazy. so being poor is just a matter of luck. as a matter of fact
Dickens was an employee of Fagin but he had to steal for him to escape from
hunger.However, Dickens crosses class lines with both good and bad characters
and the same thing goes for Nancy.
no justice
Even though the Victorian age was known for peace and
justice but that was mostly for rich people where Oliver was just a chiled in
the work house and he was abused when he asked for a little more food. did they
want to force a little chiled to go and find a job and not to be
lazy! then he was given away and worked as a slave for Mr sowerberry, its like most of the characters
in the story wanted a piece of Oliver. where is the justice in that.
An age of education
Rich people mostly do nothing expt reading playing the
piano and that was clear with Mr. Brownlow when he was robbed in front of the
bookshop and at his house he had paintings even he asked Oliver to return some
of the books he borrowed. Mrs. Maylie
tught Oliver how to read and write and she played the piano.
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق